Making Better Choices for More Sustainable Coffee
Throughout years working across the coffee value chain, people have asked us: what is the most sustainably grown coffee?
It is an important question, but also a complicated one. Many consumers look for labels or assume that certain origins must inherently be more sustainable. In practice, sustainability in coffee is rarely straightforward. Each producing region reflects its own set of trade-offs.
The Trade-Offs of Sustainability
Sustainability in coffee often comes with compromises.
In contexts where social and economic conditions are stronger, where wages are higher and labor protections exist, farmers often face higher costs of production. To remain viable, they may rely more heavily on monocropping or chemical inputs that improve yields.
In other contexts, where coffee is grown under dense shade and biodiversity appears intact, the preservation of the environment can often be less a conscious choice and more a result of economic limitation. Farmers may not have the resources to purchase equipment, inputs or improvements that could raise productivity, and by extension, their earnings.
The result is that progress in one area of sustainability can sometimes come at the expense of another.
Our Approach to More Sustainable Choices
After years of working with producers and studying supply chains, we’ve come to see sustainability not as a fixed status but as an ongoing process. There may not be a perfect way to buy coffee, but we believe two key purchase behaviors can have meaningful impact, both in the short and long term.
Buy farm traceable, ideally ‘direct trade’. Look for coffees that clearly highlight a direct relationship, or at least name the farm or farmer. This usually means the producer is recognized and rewarded for the uniqueness of their work. When coffee becomes anonymous, it competes with commodity pricing, where the cheapest option tends to win. Direct recognition helps create a pull effect in the market, signaling that specific producers and their practices are worth supporting.
Return to the coffees you love. If you enjoy a coffee, let your roaster know and tell them you want it back the following year. Each time you come back to a farm, coop, or region, you contribute to consistent, predictable demand for the producers behind that supply chain. That demand gives producers the confidence to keep investing in quality and sustainability, and it drives up the value of their product in the market. It also creates examples for others to follow, strengthening not just individual farms, but entire communities.
This may sound like a lot of work, but that is where Siip comes in….
Giving Coffee Its ‘Napa Valley’ Moment
Our mission with Siip is to make these choices easier. We help you discover which producers, groups and regions you love, and enable you to continue supporting them over time.
Today, we’ve indexed and standardized naming conventions for over 4,000 coffee farms and more than 2,000 producer regions. That means if one roaster labels a coffee from “Rivas,” another from “Chirripó,” and another from “Perez,” we connect all of those names back to the standardized terroir of “Brunca.”
This creates the opportunity for regions to have their ‘Napa Valley’ moment, and even for individual producers to have their ‘Robert Mondavi’ moment, where an area or farm becomes easily recognized as a brand by consumers who love those coffees. We’re applying the same standardization to varieties, certifications, mills, processing methods, and more.
We’re just getting started, but this work will allow us to build features that make it simple for consumers to track their favorite coffees, know when they’re available again, and keep supporting them year after year.
For us, sustainability in coffee is not about one perfect solution. It is about recognition, continuity, and steady demand that reward producers for their care and commitment.
The coffees that endure are not usually the ones with the lowest cost. They are the ones people remember, seek out, and return to again.